Comments on: No namespace indent for C++ with Vim http://www.derekwyatt.org/2009/08/23/no-namespace-indent-for-c-with-vim/ Vim... and stuff Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:22:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Leandro http://www.derekwyatt.org/2009/08/23/no-namespace-indent-for-c-with-vim/comment-page-1/#comment-1468 Leandro Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:46:10 +0000 http://www.derekwyatt.org/2009/08/23/no-namespace-indent-for-c-with-vim/#comment-1468 This is exactly what I need, but unfortunately it is not working here. :-( Analyzing your code, I couldn't figure out what does '^\s*\\s\+\S\+' match after the beginning of the line ('^') and blanks ('\s*'). Apparently the next 5 chars ('\\s\+') evaluates to another regex ('\s+') but I don't see the point. The tail of the string then matches one non blank char ('\S+') and the last part escapes a plus sign. If I'm right, the string on the next line would match (ignoring the '^' which indicates the beginning of the line): ^ \s+a+ Like I said before, I don't see where it takes. Could you give me a light? Thanks in advance for your attention. Regards, Leandro This is exactly what I need, but unfortunately it is not working here. :-(

Analyzing your code, I couldn’t figure out what does ‘^\s*\\s\+\S\+’ match after the beginning of the line (‘^’) and blanks (‘\s*’). Apparently the next 5 chars (‘\\s\+’) evaluates to another regex (‘\s+’) but I don’t see the point. The tail of the string then matches one non blank char (‘\S+’) and the last part escapes a plus sign. If I’m right, the string on the next line would match (ignoring the ‘^’ which indicates the beginning of the line):
^ \s+a+

Like I said before, I don’t see where it takes. Could you give me a light?

Thanks in advance for your attention.

Regards,
Leandro

]]> By: Mike Jarvis http://www.derekwyatt.org/2009/08/23/no-namespace-indent-for-c-with-vim/comment-page-1/#comment-246 Mike Jarvis Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:06:08 +0000 http://www.derekwyatt.org/2009/08/23/no-namespace-indent-for-c-with-vim/#comment-246 This is great. Thanks! The other C++ thing that I think vim gets wrong is indenting the line after template. I'd like the intent to look like: template <typename T> T foo(T x); But vim indents the second line. The only workaround I had found was to add +0 to cinoptions, but that has other undesirable side effects. Your function for (not) indenting namespace blocks might give me enough of a starting point to extend it to get the indent right for these lines as well. Peace, Mike This is great. Thanks!

The other C++ thing that I think vim gets wrong is indenting the line after template. I’d like the intent to look like:

template <typename T>
T foo(T x);

But vim indents the second line. The only workaround I had found was to add +0 to cinoptions, but that has other undesirable side effects.

Your function for (not) indenting namespace blocks might give me enough of a starting point to extend it to get the indent right for these lines as well.

Peace,
Mike

]]>